Macroeconomists have debated whether financial crises are predictable. New research shows that indeed they are – and are caused by the rapid expansions of credit accompanied by asset-price booms.
Robin Greenwood, Samuel Hanson and Jacob Sorensen contribute to the macroeconomic literature with their March 2021 study, “Predictable Financial Crises,” published in the January 2022 issue of The Journal of Finance, in which they analyzed the probability of financial crises as a function of past credit and asset-price growth. They combined historical data on the growth of outstanding credit to nonfinancial businesses and households with data on the growth of equity and home prices to estimate the future probability of a financial crisis in a panel of 42 countries over the period 1950-2016.
Greenwood, Hanson and Sorensen constructed an indicator variable they called the red-zone (R-zone) that identified periods of potential credit market overheating. A country was in the business R-zone if nonfinancial business credit growth over the past three years was in the top quintile of the full sample distribution, and stock market returns over the same window were in the top tercile. Following is a summary of their findings:
- Crises can be predicted using past credit growth in simple linear forecasting regressions – both nonfinancial business and household credit growth forecast the onset of a future crisis.
- The degree of predictability, however, is modest, even at horizons of up to five years – a one standard deviation increase in real one-year credit growth led to about a 3-percentage point increase in the probability of a crisis within the next five years. However, the degree of predictability increases when large credit expansions are accompanied by asset price booms.
- When nonfinancial business credit growth is high and stock market valuations have risen sharply, or when household credit growth is high and home prices have risen sharply, the probability of a subsequent crisis is substantially elevated.
- The probability of a crisis at a one-year horizon was 13% if a country was in the business R-zone, a more than threefold increase over the unconditional probability of 4%. The comparable one-year probability was 14% if a country was in the household R-zone – if household credit growth and home price growth were jointly elevated.
Greenwood, Hanson and Sorenson noted “Crises are often slow to develop, suggesting that policymakers have time to act based on early warning signs. For instance, the United States was in the household R-zone from 2002–2006 and a financial crisis arrived in 2007.” Their findings led them to conclude: “Our evidence challenges the view that financial crises are unpredictable ‘bolts from the sky’ and supports the Kindleberger-Minsky view that crises are the byproduct of predictable, boom-bust credit cycles. This predictability favors policies that lean against incipient credit-market booms.”
Summary
Greenwood, Hanson and Sorenson documented the strength of the interaction effect between credit and asset-price growth using a simple and transparent methodology. That allowed them to demonstrate that there is a higher degree of crisis predictability than has been documented in prior studies. Their findings favor the Kindleberger-Minsky view that credit cycles and financial crises are somewhat predictable and that policymakers should take proactive measures to “lean against the wind” of credit booms, adopting countercyclical policies.
Larry Swedroe is the chief research officer for Buckingham Strategic Wealth and Buckingham Strategic Partners.
For informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Certain information is based upon third party data and may become outdated or otherwise superseded without notice. Third party information is deemed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. By clicking on any of the links above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, and do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements, or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party websites. We are not responsible for the content, availability, or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products, or services available on or through them. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) nor any other federal or state agency have approved, determined the accuracy, or confirmed the adequacy of this article. The opinions expressed by featured authors are their own and may not accurately reflect those of the Buckingham Strategic Wealth® or Buckingham Strategic Partners®, collectively Buckingham Wealth Partners. LSR-22-264